"
The Court concluded that the federal government did not have the
power to require individuals to buy health insurance, but it did have
the power to impose a penalty on those who failed to do so. The Code
Sec. 5000A(a) individual mandate that required persons to carry
minimum essential health coverage for themselves and their dependents
exceeded the federal government's powers under the Commerce Clause
(Article I, §8, clause 3) because it would require inactive
individuals to become active in interstate commerce. In addition,
regardless of how integral the mandate was to the health care reform
law as a whole, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, §8, clause
18) did not provide independent authority for it.
However, the shared responsibility payment that Code Sec.
5000A(b) imposed for violating the mandate was a constitutional
exercise of the federal government's Taxing Power under Article I, §8,
clause 1. The Taxing Power is broader than the Commerce Power,
because it gives the federal government a lesser amount of control
over individual conduct, limited to financial coercion but not
extending to criminal punishments. Although it was identified as a
penalty, the payment is actually a tax because it was not intended to
be punitive: its amount is relatively small, it applies even if the
taxpayer does not knowingly violate the mandate, and the IRS has the
sole authority to assess and collect it. The fact that the payment was
intended to affect individual conduct does not preclude it from being
a tax, especially since there are no criminal penalties for failing
to carry insurance. In addition, the payment does not violate the
prohibition on direct or capitation taxes (Article I, §9, clause 4)
because it is triggered by specific circumstances, and is not imposed
on every person or on the ownership of land or personal property.
Although the penalty actually functions as a tax, it is
not subject to the Anti-Injunction Act under Code Sec. 7421(a) . Since
Congress characterized the payment as a penalty, rather than a tax,
it was clear that Congress did not intend for the Anti-Injunction Act
to apply. This intention is not affected by the fact that the penalty
is a tax for purposes of determining whether Congress had the power to
impose it. The issue of the Anti-Injunction Act was a matter of
statutory interpretation, so the language Congress used determined the
outcome. However, the constitutional issue of whether Congress has
the power to impose the tax was determined by the way the penalty
actually operated, rather than what it was called.
Finally, the federal government could not withhold
existing federal Medicaid funding in order to force a state to extend
Medicaid coverage to individuals whose income was less than 133% of
the applicable federal poverty levels. The extension so exceeded the
original parameters of the Medicaid program that states could not be
considered to have voluntarily agreed to it at the time they agreed to
participate in the Medicaid program. However, this provision could
simply be severed from the remainder of PPACA."
Friday, June 29, 2012
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Webinar Available from the IRS
U.S. Department Of Homeland Security Offers Free Webinars
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is offering free webinars throughout the month of June on E-Verify, Self-Check, and Form I-9. The following seminars are being offered:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is offering free webinars throughout the month of June on E-Verify, Self-Check, and Form I-9. The following seminars are being offered:
- E-Verify Overview. Learn how this free service works, how to enroll, employer responsibilities, program highlights, and see a demonstration.
- E-Verify for Federal Contractors. For Federal contractors that have been or may be awarded a Federal contract with the FAR E-Verify Clause.
- E-Verify for Existing Users. A detailed review of E-Verify specifically for existing users. Topics include Form I-9, user roles, case alerts, how to handle a Tentative Nonconfirmation and common user mistakes.
- An overview of "Self Check". A voluntary, fast, free and simple service that allows individuals to check their own employment eligibility.
- Form I-9. Get an overview of the Form I-9 process, including step by step instructions on how to complete each section, retention and storage.
- CNMI. An overview to employers and workers residing in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) about Form I-9.
Monday, June 18, 2012
Help your drivers live better lives
Truck stops, famous for cheeseburgers and steaks and all–you-can-eat buffets, also are adapting to concerns about driver fitness and health. Snap Fitness, a franchiser of 24-hour fitness centers, announced Aug. 23 that it will locate workout centers in several Pilot Flying J Travel Centers across the country.
TravelCenters of America, which owns the Petro Stopping Centers brand, has opened two dozen workout
facilities this year in locations along heavily traveled interstates.
TravelCenters of America, which owns the Petro Stopping Centers brand, has opened two dozen workout
facilities this year in locations along heavily traveled interstates.
Cost of Goods Sold
The following are types
of expenses that go into figuring the cost of goods sold.
·
The cost of products or
raw materials, including freight
·
Storage
·
Direct labor costs
(including contributions to pensions or annuity plans) for workers who produce
the products
·
Factory overhead
Under the uniform
capitalization rules, you must capitalize the direct costs and part of the
indirect costs for certain production or resale activities. Indirect costs
include rent, interest, taxes, storage, purchasing, processing, repackaging,
handling, and administrative costs.
This rule does not apply
to personal property you acquire for resale if your average annual gross
receipts (or those of your predecessor) for the preceding 3 tax years are not
more than $10 million.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Are you properly prepared for you taxes based on your tax bracket?
Are you properly prepared for you taxes based on your tax
bracket? There is still time to change
your withholding's should you wish to lower your tax bill. Go to my website accounting4truckers.net and
get some free advice. The 2012 breakdown is listed below:
Gross Earnings Single Married Head of Household
10% Bracket | $0 – $8,700 | $0 – $17,400 | $0 – $12,400 | |
15% Bracket | $8,701 – $35,350 | $17,401 – $70,700 | $12,401 – $47,350 | |
25% Bracket | $35,351 – $85,650 | $70,701 – $142,700 | $47,351 – $122,300 | |
28% Bracket | $85,651 – $178,650 | $142,701 – $217,450 | $122,301 – $198,050 | |
33% Bracket | $178,651 – $388,350 | $217,451 – $388,350 | $198,051 – $388,350 | |
35% Bracket | $388,350+ | $388,350+ | $388,350+ |
Thursday, June 14, 2012
News for the trucking industry
Faced with increasing criticism from the
trucking industry, federal regulators are giving motor carriers more
time to comment on how changes in new safety rules could affect their
safety-measurement system scores, a Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration spokeswoman said last week.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)